Pulling the receipt…
Pulling the receipt…
MEBRO
06/09/26 · 12:11 PM UTC · 15 SOURCES
EXHIBIT A
What you submitted
“If the latest batch of votes came from the same underlying voter population as the earlier count, the odds of Nithya Raman receiving 44.1% of the batch are about 1 in 10^1,822.”
TL;DR ·Statistical claims of fraud in the L.A. mayoral race are debunked and based on misread data.
The claim that Nithya Raman's vote count is statistically impossible is false and originated from a misreading of election data . Local and federal officials, including the Department of Justice, have debunked social media allegations of voting discrepancies, describing them as baseless . While Raman did surge past Spencer Pratt as late-arriving mail-in ballots were processed , political experts and fact-checkers note that changing results are a normal part of the counting process rather than evidence of fraud . The specific statistical anomalies cited online have been identified as a simple mix-up that fueled false conspiracy theories regarding the L.A. vote count .
TIER B
TIER B
TIER B
TIER B
TIER B
TIER A
TIER A
TIER A
TIER B
TIER B
TIER B
TIER B
TIER B
TIER B
TIER B
CHECK #______
Got your own trust-me-bro?
Because “trust me bro” isn’t a source.