MEBRO
FACT CHECK #QDATVE_0
06/06/26 · 9:07 PM UTC · 6 SOURCES
EXHIBIT A
What you submitted
“The common English translation of Article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli is considered inaccurate by some historians.”
TL;DR ·Historians identify significant discrepancies between the original Arabic text and the English translation.
WHAT WE FOUND
The Treaty of Tripoli is often cited in discussions regarding religion in government because of Article 11 . The most common English version, translated by Joel Barlow, claims the U.S. is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion . However, historians have identified that this English translation is inaccurate when compared to the original Arabic text . The Arabic version of the article contains no such statement, focusing instead on religious opinions not being a pretext for violating the treaty . Because of this discrepancy, some argue the English text was essentially an unofficial addition by Barlow or a specific declaration regarding state establishment . Thus, the clause is viewed by some as an unreliable representation of the original diplomatic agreement .
SOURCES
- 1 · avalon.law.yale.eduACADEMICTreaty of Peace and Friendship, Signed at Tripoli ...
TIER A
- 2 · en.wikipedia.orgWEBTreaty of Tripoli
TIER B
- 3 · firstamendment.mtsu.eduACADEMIC1797 Treaty of Tripoli | The First Amendment Encyclopedia
TIER A
- 4 · wallbuilders.comWEBTreaty of Tripoli
TIER B
- 5 · study.comACADEMICTreaty of Tripoli in 1797: Article 11 - Video
TIER A
- 6 · patheos.comWEBSecularists, Please Stop Quoting The Treaty Of Tripoli
TIER B
CHECK #______
Got your own trust-me-bro?
Because “trust me bro” isn’t a source.