MEBRO
DISINFO DESK
Politics & Policy
No, Voting Machines Aren't "Flipping" Ballots in the 2026 Midterms — It's the Same Recycled Panic Since 2018
Viral videos claiming touchscreen machines are swapping votes for the Nov. 3 midterms are either screen-calibration glitches caught before ballots were cast, or old footage from 2018, 2019 and 2024 relabeled as breaking news.
FILED NOV 2, 2026 · UPDATED NOV 2, 2026 · 5 SOURCES
The Claim
As early voting ramped up for the Nov. 3, 2026 midterms, viral posts across Facebook, X and TikTok claimed touchscreen voting machines were secretly switching voters' selections from one party's candidate to the other [1][2].
On Oct. 21, Stella Parton — Dolly Parton's sister — posted on Facebook that her ballot at Nashville's Hermitage Library "kept flipping to the wrong candidate," repeatedly defaulting to Senate candidate Marsha Blackburn, and that she had to correct her selection three times before it registered [1][2].
Similar reports surfaced from Franklin, Spring Hill and Nolensville in Williamson County, Tennessee, per WSMV-TV (Oct. 22), and from Madison County via WBBJ-TV (Oct. 17) [1]. In Texas, three Bexar County voters told KSAT-TV (Oct. 23) that machines changed or removed their picks, and a Kendall County man said on Instagram that his mother-in-law's Democratic selections kept switching to Republican candidates [2].
A Facebook post from the progressive group "The Other 98%" on Oct. 22 claimed the "very disturbing trend" was also hitting Florida and Ohio, pushing the claim to a national audience [2]. The underlying claim: an entire class of voting machines is systematically converting ballots from one party to another.
The Evidence
Every affected Tennessee and Texas county uses ES&S ExpressVote ballot-marking devices, which print a paper ballot that the voter reviews before it is cast — the opposite of a system built to secretly alter votes undetected [1][2].
Tennessee's Coordinator of Elections, Mark Goins, called the reports "voter error," most likely an unintended touch, noting equipment is tested beforehand and styluses are available on request. The state received exactly one such complaint out of roughly 400,000 ballots already cast [1][2].
Bexar County Elections Administrator Michele Carew said mismatches are "almost always due to user touchscreen sensitivity, not machine malfunction," adding the machines are never connected to the internet [2]. Texas Assistant Secretary of State for Communications Alicia Pierce said she was unaware of any such reports statewide and noted any affected machine "must produce a human-readable paper ballot that a voter can review before casting" [2].
ES&S spokesperson Katina Granger told PolitiFact the company has received no widespread reports from election officials, called the incidents "rare," and said: "There is no scenario in which a voter would be forced to cast a ballot that they believe did not reflect their intentions" [2].
Two of the "proof" clips being shared as 2026 footage are recycled from earlier elections. An Oct. 23 video is actually from Mississippi's 2019 Republican gubernatorial primary, showing candidates Tate Reeves and Bill Waller Jr. [1][2]; The Blaze's original 2019 report on that clip found officials in two counties attributed the glitch to machine miscalibration, not rigging, after a voter trying to select Waller watched the screen repeatedly mark Reeves instead [5]. A second video, shared Oct. 22, is from a 2018 Indiana U.S. House race between Jim Baird and Tobi Beck [1][2].
Who's Spreading It
This isn't the first time the identical claim has gone viral — it recurs almost every election cycle. In 2024, a near-identical video from Laurel County, Kentucky, appearing to show a touchscreen switching a Trump vote to Kamala Harris, drew tens of millions of views [3][4].
Kentucky Secretary of State Michael Adams said flatly: "There is no 'vote-switching.'" Laurel County Clerk Tony Brown confirmed the voter's final printed ballot matched their intent, and election workers could reproduce the glitch only once, after deliberately tapping between option boxes, and never again afterward [4].
Media Matters found that 2024 video was amplified by Joe Rogan, Nick Sortor, The Gateway Pundit, True the Vote and several QAnon-linked accounts, racking up millions of additional views beyond the original clip [3].
The pattern is consistent: a real but isolated touchscreen miscalibration, caught and corrected through the machine's own paper-ballot review step, gets stripped of context and recirculated years later as fresh proof of rigging. That is exactly what is happening again heading into the 2026 midterms [1][2][3].
The Verdict
FALSE. No election official, independent security researcher, or the machines' own vendor has found evidence that any voting machine is systematically switching votes in the 2026 midterms [1][2][3]. The reported incidents are isolated, caught by the paper-ballot review step built into every affected machine, and traced to screen calibration or imprecise touches — not hacking or reprogramming [1][2].
Several of the viral "proof" clips are literally old news repurposed from 2018, 2019 and 2024 elections [1][2][5]. Voters who notice a mismatch should check the review screen and the printed paper ballot before casting, and flag any discrepancy to a poll worker immediately [1][2].
SOURCES · 5
- [1]PolitiFact - 2026 midterm elections: Are voting machines in Tennessee and Texas flipping or swapping votes?
90/100 · politifact.com
- [2]WLRN - No evidence voting machines are purposely flipping votes. It's usually user error and can be fixed
72/100 · wlrn.org
- [3]Media Matters - Right-wing media amplify baseless claims about touch screen voting machines
72/100 · mediamatters.org
- [4]Good Morning America - Kentucky election officials push back on viral vote-switching claims
72/100 · goodmorningamerica.com
- [5]The Blaze - Touch-screen voting machines reportedly flipped votes in Mississippi race
72/100 · theblaze.com
MEBRO · DISINFO DESK · mebro.app
Investigative report — not a user-submitted fact-check.
AI-built, source-verified. Every claim here was checked against the sources cited above before publishing — but don't just trust us: follow any citation to its source and confirm it yourself. That's the whole point.