MEBRO
DISINFO DESK
Politics & Policy
Trump Told a Nebraska Crowd to "Let Them Take Out" LA and San Diego. Here's What He Actually Meant.
A viral clip has Trump inviting Iran to bomb two American cities. The full quote, and the fight over what it means, tell a messier story.
FILED OCT 7, 2026 · UPDATED OCT 7, 2026 · 5 SOURCES
The Claim
On October 5, 2026, at a midterm campaign rally in Grand Island, Nebraska, President Trump defended the ongoing — and increasingly costly — war with Iran by telling the crowd it was "a small price to pay for keeping the world safe, keeping our country safe," then added: "They can take out a city. Let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego. That's — this is a very small price to pay, and it's going to be over with very soon." [1][5] The crowd cheered. [5]
Clips of the line spread within hours stripped down to their most alarming reading: that the sitting president had just invited a wartime enemy to bomb two American cities. Courier Newsroom ran the headline "Trump says Iran bombing Los Angeles, San Diego would be a 'very small price to pay,'" and Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski said on air Trump was "casually calling for Iran to attack" the cities. [4] The viral framing treated a garbled, badly phrased sentence as a literal invitation to attack — a reading the full context doesn't clearly support.
The Evidence
The quote itself is real and undisputed — Trump said it, on camera, at the Nebraska rally, in front of a cheering crowd. [1][3][5] What's contested is what he meant by it. In the sentences around the "take out" line, Trump's point was about rising gas prices from the Iran war: paying more at the pump now, he argued, is worth it because the alternative — letting Iran finish building a nuclear weapon — would have put Los Angeles and San Diego within range of an actual nuclear strike. [2][5]
White House communications director Steven Cheung pushed back hard on the viral interpretation: "The media freakout over President Trump's comments is not rooted in reality. He was clearly stating U.S. cities would have been threatened if a nuclear Iran hadn't been stopped." [3][5] FactCheck.org, reviewing the full transcript, called the remarks confusing but found no clear evidence Trump was advocating an actual attack — his logic tracked the same "small price to pay" line he'd just used about gas prices, applied to a hypothetical nuclear scenario the war is meant to prevent. [2]
Context cuts against a literal "invitation to attack" reading, but it doesn't make the remarks reassuring. The war with Iran is real and ongoing; Sen. Alex Padilla noted at least 19 U.S. servicemembers have died in it. [4] A president musing — even hypothetically — about his own cities being "taken out," to a cheering rally crowd, is the kind of muddled rhetoric fact-checkers flag even when it isn't literally what critics claimed.
Who's Spreading It
California officials reacted as though the literal reading were correct. Gov. Gavin Newsom called Trump "deranged and dangerous" and posted "Donald Trump is mentally ill. TIME FOR THE 25TH!" — an explicit call to invoke the 25th Amendment. [3] Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the remarks amounted to "a president of the United States, inviting a country that we are at war with to attack an American city." [3] San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria said, "San Diego is not collateral damage. We are not expendable." [3]
The pushback wasn't only partisan: Republican San Diego-area congressional candidate Jim Desmond also objected, saying "No American city is expendable." [5] The clip is being amplified by officials and media on both sides reacting to the headline version of the quote rather than the full transcript — and the White House's rebuttal, while accurate about the gas-price framing, glosses over how genuinely confusing Trump's own phrasing was.
The Verdict
MISLEADING. Trump did say the words attributed to him — that part of the viral claim is accurate. [1][2][3][5] But the dominant framing spreading online — that he explicitly invited or wants Iran to bomb Los Angeles and San Diego — overstates what the full quote and surrounding context support. [2] Read in full, his remarks were a garbled attempt to argue that enduring higher gas prices from the Iran war is worth it to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran from ever threatening those cities, not an endorsement of an actual strike. [2][5]
A real quote, stripped of its surrounding sentences and repackaged as something more alarming than the full context supports, is MISLEADING — not FALSE, since the clip is genuine, and not TRUE, since the clip genuinely does show a president casually name-checking two American cities being "taken out" to a cheering crowd, which is its own problem regardless of intent. [4][5]
SOURCES · 5
- [1]ABC News - Trump suggests Iran could 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego if it develops nuclear weapons
86/100 · abcnews.com
- [2]FactCheck.org - The Context for Trump's 'Take Out' Los Angeles, San Diego Remarks
92/100 · factcheck.org
- [3]CBS News Los Angeles - Trump suggests allowing Iran to 'take out' LA and San Diego during campaign rally
88/100 · cbsnews.com
- [4]NBC Los Angeles - 'Let them take out Los Angeles': President Trump defends ongoing war with Iran
72/100 · nbclosangeles.com
- [5]PolitiFact - In Context: What Trump said about gas prices, Iran and taking out Los Angeles and San Diego
90/100 · politifact.com
MEBRO · DISINFO DESK · mebro.app
Investigative report — not a user-submitted fact-check.
AI-built, source-verified. Every claim here was checked against the sources cited above before publishing — but don't just trust us: follow any citation to its source and confirm it yourself. That's the whole point.